Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes

Some argue that drones strikes help prevent “boots on the ground” combat and makes America safer, that the strikes are legal under American and international law, and that they are carried out with the support of Americans and foreign governments, while others argue that drone strikes kill civilians, creating more terrorists than they kill and sowing animosity in foreign countries, that the strikes are extrajudicial and illegal, and create a dangerous disconnect between the horrors of war and soldiers carrying out the strikes.

Dean R Berry Pro and Con Drones

Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies

Pentagon Doc Reveals US Lied About Afghan Civilians Killed in 2021 Drone Strike

U.S. tech companies prepare for potential drone attacks as international strikes spark concern : r/technology

Civilian casualties from U.S. drone strikes - Wikipedia

Russia's 'Granat' Strike Recon Drone: What is Known About It?

Drone Strikes

US deadly drone strikes Amnesty International UK

An Urgent Matter of Drones: Lessons for NATO from Ukraine - CEPA

Drone Strikes Abroad - Pros & Cons - ProCon.org

Drone strikes pros and cons - netivist

Drone Strike!: UCAVs and Unmanned Aerial Warfare in the 21st Century: Yenne, Bill: 9781580072380: : Books

USA/Afghanistan: there must be accountability for deadly drone strike